<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 892 East Long Demolition &#8211;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://columbushomesblog.com/2007/05/24/892-east-long-demolition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://columbushomesblog.com/2007/05/24/892-east-long-demolition/</link>
	<description>Columbus Real Estate News That Matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:58:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Columbusite</title>
		<link>http://columbushomesblog.com/2007/05/24/892-east-long-demolition/comment-page-1/#comment-10523</link>
		<dc:creator>Columbusite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 18:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.columbushomesblog.com/2007/05/24/892-east-long-demolition/#comment-10523</guid>
		<description>In other cities, it is simply illegal to tear down historic structures. We need to adopt a similar policy and only allow demolition in the very rare occasion that an older building cannot be salvaged, instead of no one wanting to pay for rehabbing.  I had been wondering what had been in those empty lots I&#039;m looking at from Urban Spirit. Any word on who owns those lots? I&#039;m going to be doing a Long St entry and things like this just make it that much harder to bring activity to the area. &quot;Urban Renewal&quot;, and it is insane that it is still happening, has been a proven failure nationwide resulting in empty lots that never saw the development that would supposedly fill them. I bet the combined space of all of those would equal a  pretty good-sized city. You would think there would have been fierce opposition to what had contributed so much decline to the neighborhood, but maybe residents have taken a down-and-out position. Did the KLBNA even make a fuss?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other cities, it is simply illegal to tear down historic structures. We need to adopt a similar policy and only allow demolition in the very rare occasion that an older building cannot be salvaged, instead of no one wanting to pay for rehabbing.  I had been wondering what had been in those empty lots I&#8217;m looking at from Urban Spirit. Any word on who owns those lots? I&#8217;m going to be doing a Long St entry and things like this just make it that much harder to bring activity to the area. &#8220;Urban Renewal&#8221;, and it is insane that it is still happening, has been a proven failure nationwide resulting in empty lots that never saw the development that would supposedly fill them. I bet the combined space of all of those would equal a  pretty good-sized city. You would think there would have been fierce opposition to what had contributed so much decline to the neighborhood, but maybe residents have taken a down-and-out position. Did the KLBNA even make a fuss?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
